close

如何建立科學部落格
http://www.scidev.net/zh/new-technologies/practical-guides/zh-132943.html
Damian Carrington

2008年9月30日 | EN | 中文
Man using wifi in the street

Flickr/hamron

科學博客(網誌)能讓你與最廣泛的受眾分享你對科學的熱情與專業技能。Damian Carrington撰文表明,啟動這一過程很容易。

通過提供迄今最廉價的資訊共用網路,萬維網已經改變了世界。而且博客(網志)軟體的發展——如今它們功能強大且免費使用——能讓任何人與世界上接入互聯網的其他人即時分享他們的思想。

這種個人的聯繫是撰寫博客(網志)的核心。博客(網志)(blog)這個詞來源於web log(網路日誌),也就是日記的意思。正如日記可以有許多種形式,博客(網志)也是如此,但是它們傾向于和傳統媒體的側重點不同。

非常成功的博客(網志)網路Huffington Post的創始人Arianna Huffington用了一個醫學類比。她把主流媒體描述成患有注意缺陷多動障礙——總是尋找下一個新的事情,而不管昨天未完結的故事。相比之下,博客(網志)作者更像是患有強迫症——不斷頑強地追蹤著同一個題材。

寫什麼博客(網志)——以及如何寫?

你可能是一位科學家,想用博客(網志)記錄你自己的科學或者科學家面臨的問題。你可能是一位元科學記者,想用一種不同於你所服務的更傳統的出版物的方式報導科學。或者你可能想成為一位元政治評論家,監視科學政策及其可能的影響。所有這些都可能歸於科學博客(網志)寫作之下,它們同樣也遵循許多其他類型的博客(網志)的規則。

首先,選擇一個你既熱衷又瞭解的主題。把重點放在這個主題上。如果選擇太寬泛的主體——例如物理學——你就會發現你很難把一些獨特而有趣的東西放在網上從而吸引讀者。選擇主題過窄的風險則低得多——例如,在你的組織裏可能沒有多少人關心蛾類,但是在全世界範圍內卻可能很多。

你選擇用博客(網志)記錄的東西——以及如何記錄——還將取決於你預期的受眾,不論他們是該領域的科學家、來自其他學科的科學家還是公眾。

一個極好而且極其成功的科學博客(網志)名為Pharyngula,它是由明尼蘇達大學的生物學家P. Z. Myers撰寫的。他把該博客(網志)描述成“一個無神的自由主義者的進化、發育和隨機的生物學隨筆”,而且它成為了美國神創論辯論中的一個強有力的支持科學的聲音。

這個博客(網志)是ScienceBlogs網站上的許多優秀的博客(網志)之一。該網站的創始人Adam Bly的目標是讓科學成為政治或藝術等文化的關鍵部分,而ScienceBlogs展現了博客(網志)的迷人的和對話式的風格如何讓這個目標成功。

那麼,一個博客(網志)應該多麼個性化?這裏有個經驗法則——如果你開始寫你的寵物狗,你可能已經過界了。但是只要沒有那種東西就行,這是最基本的。你的個性能讓你的博客(網志)勝過其他博客(網志),而且還將給你帶來和讀者之間極為重要的聯繫。

這可能讓學者和職業記者感到不舒服,他們的職業生涯是在第三人稱的保護下度過的(我還記得當我開始寫博客(網志)的時候,我很費力地用“我”開頭)。但是堅持下去,你將迅速適應過來並感到它令人解放。如果你不能這樣做,那麼你寫的不是博客(網志),而是一片論文。

隔多長時間寫一篇?

你應該間隔多長時間寫一篇博客(網志)?簡短的答案是每天都寫。讀者希望感受到你的博客是鮮活的,而頻繁張貼文章能展現出這一點。最少一周寫兩次。如果比這再少,你需要是一個具有很大影響力的人物才能成功。

避免親自頻繁張貼文章的一個方法是建立一個群博客(網志)。但是這可能很困難,除非這個群的人們都有同一個清晰的目的和類似的態度。這種方法的一個成功的範例是Effect Measure,這是由一群公共衛生專業人士維護的博客(網志)。

如果每天張貼文章的前景令人感到不快,那麼記住每個帖子不需要是長達千言的語言縝密和精心編排的散文。事實上恰恰相反——把它當成與你的讀者進行一場對話。

利用你的專業技能對新聞事件發表短評,例如指出錯誤的概念,這是很好的。含有指向網上其他地方的新聞或有趣資訊的鏈結的帖子也很有價值。

你在用你的專業知識為其他人過濾網上的海量資訊。通過把材料聚合起來,你在為你的讀者編輯萬維網。記住,鏈結指向的不必一定是文章。視頻、照片和圖畫可能更吸引人。如果我正在寫關於企鵝的博客(網志),我一定會鏈結到這個視頻。如果你有自己的照片或視頻就更好了——把它們放到博客(網志)上是很簡單的。

技術問題

在這裏我不會試圖給出一個如何寫博客(網志)的詳細步驟——網上有很多說明。但是如果你能使用一個字處理程式或網頁流覽器,你就已經擁有了你所需的技能的 90%。其餘的10%很簡單,例如使用基本的HTML語法,或者使用你的博客(網志)軟體裏的按鈕從而讓關鍵字變成粗體或者加入鏈結。

有很多種博客(網志)軟體可供選用,它們都有使用指南。你可以選擇和你的技術知識水準相符的軟體。最簡單的是網站為你提供博客(網志)平臺,最流行的是Blogger、Wordpress和Typepad。

這種博客網站的缺點是你對網址的可控性較少。如果你想在自己的伺服器上放置你的博客(網志),試一試Movable Type等軟體。

《衛報》的博客(網志)高手Kevin Anderson建議閱讀如下網站的關於各種不同選項的優缺點的指南:Problogger、readwriteweb 和 pcworld.com。

發展中國家的一些地區的帶寬和互聯網接入的限制可能限制了所有寫博客(網志)的形式。

生活在烏干達坎帕拉的軟體發展者Jonathan Gosier把在發展中國家寫博客(網志)描述成“一個耐性、持久和獨創性的一課”。他在Apprifca的博客(網志)上推薦了10個可以緩解停電、互聯網接入不穩定和可能的資料丟失等挑戰的10個應用程式。

爭取讀者

一旦你建立好了你的博客(網志)並開始運行,你就需要讓人們來訪問它。最開始這可能很困難,但是要耐心。你可以採取一些手段,關鍵是建立鏈結。

首先,你需要在你的帖子裏包括許多鏈結。這有助於“搜索引擎優化”,也就是幫助搜索引擎理解你的博客(網志)是什麼類型的網站,這就意味著檢索你的主題的人們將更有可能找到你的博客(網志)。

更重要的是鼓勵從其他網站鏈結到你的博客(網志)。你可以通過在你喜歡的其他網站上留言從而實現這一點,留言中包括了指向你的博客(網站)上的相關帖子的鏈結。要注意詞語的相關性——如果你的鏈結不相關,它們會讓人們感到惱火,這可不是變得流行的一個方式。

你還可以列出你喜歡的其他博客(網志)——這被稱為blogroll。值得問問這些博客(網志)主人是否願意給你做鏈結——如果他們喜歡你的博客(網志),那麼他們就會這樣做。最後,值得把你的博客(網志)的細節提供給Technorati網站,它的作用就像專門檢索博客(網志)的搜索引擎。

如果你打算寫關於同行評議的科研論文的博客(網志),你可以在Research Blogging上註冊,這是一個在註冊用戶撰寫關於新的期刊論文的帖子的時候會把他們的帖子加亮的一個網站。

引發討論

寫博客(網志)與傳統的新聞和科學傳播還有另一個重要的不同點。傳統媒體的作者不能讓問題懸而未決——他們的故事需要一個開頭、發展和結尾。但是寫博客(網志)是一場對話,這意味著你可以提問題,正如我的同事、食品作者Jay Rayner最近關於轉基因食品主題做得那樣。

和《衛報》有聯繫的一個真正優秀的科學博客(網志)是Bad Science,,它的作者是醫學博士Ben Goldacre。他和讀者之間的對話常常產生未來帖子的靈感。

和你的讀者進行討論是一個良好的博客(網志)的一個關鍵標誌。沒有討論的博客(網志)就像沒有電話參與者的電臺談話節目——那就是一場演講。製造一場討論的一個最簡單方式就是問問別人——“你對我寫的東西有何看法?”當有人評論的時候,確保你在博客(網志)上回復它們。畢竟,你不應該忽視和你親自交談的人。

並非所有的評論是有趣或者建設性的,管理你的博客(網志)上的評論是一個艱難的平衡。如果你在刪除評論方面過於敏感,讀者將會很快發現你並不真正對辯論感興趣。另一方面,如果你放任所有的東西,你很快就會發現你的博客(網志)上充斥著搗亂的人——一些張貼無關評論或煽動性評論從而破壞討論的人們——而這可能惹惱或者脅迫感興趣的人們,把他們趕跑。

如果你親自回復他們,許多網上搗亂者將會消失。當他們意識到在螢幕那邊有一個真人的時候,他們的敵對行為就會消退。但是我不想誇大這個問題——獲得評論比對付糟糕的評論更困難。記住,博客(網志)是你的空間。你有趕走你反對的人們的自由,正如在你自己的家裏一樣。

最後,我還有一個問題:你覺得我遺漏了什麼?

Damian Carrington是英國《衛報》的環境問題網路編輯,他曾經是《新科學家》網站的編輯和BBC新聞網站的科學記者。

How to set up a science blog

Damian Carrington



30 September 2008 | EN | 中文


Flickr/hamron


Science blogs let you share your passion and expertise with the widest possible audience. Damian Carrington shows it's easy to get started.


The World Wide Web has changed the world by providing the cheapest information sharing network ever seen. And the development of blogging software, now powerful and free to use, allows anyone to share their thoughts instantly with anyone else in the world with an Internet connection.


That personal link is at the heart of blogging. The very word blog comes from web log, in other words a diary. Just as diaries can have many forms, so can blogs, but they tend to differ from conventional media in their focus.


Arianna Huffington, founder of the highly successful blog network Huffington Post, uses a medical analogy. She describes the mainstream media as suffering from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder — always looking for the next new thing and leaving yesterday's stories unfinished. Bloggers, in contrast, are more like obsessive-compulsives — persistently and doggedly pursuing single topics.


What to blog on — and how?

You might be a scientist who wants to blog about your own science or issues facing scientists. You might be a science journalist wanting to report on science in a way that is different to the more conventional publications that you write for. Or you may be a wannabe political commentator, monitoring science policy and its potential impacts. All of these could come under the umbrella of science blogging, which follows many of the same rules as other types of blogs.


First, choose a subject that you are both passionate and knowledgeable about. Keep it focused. Choose too broad a topic — physics, say — and you will find it very hard to add something unique and interesting to the web that will attract readers. The risk of picking too narrow a topic is far lower — there may be few people in your organisation who care deeply about moths, for example, but there are likely to be many more around the world.


What you choose to blog about — and how — will also depend on your intended audience, be they scientists in that field, scientists from other disciplines or the general public.


One of the very best, and most successful, science blogs is called Pharyngula, written by biologist P. Z. Myers, who works at the University of Minnesota. He describes it as "evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal", and it has been a powerful pro-science voice in the creationism debate in the United States.


The blog is one of many excellent blogs on ScienceBlogs. The site's founder, Adam Bly, aims to make science as central to culture as politics or the arts, and ScienceBlogs shows how the engaging and conversational style of blogs can help make that happen.


So how personal should a blog get? Here's a rule of thumb — if you start writing about your pet dog, you have probably crossed a line. But anything short of that is not only fine, it's essential. Your personality is what will make your blog stand out from others, and will bring you that all important connection with your readers.


This can be uncomfortable for academics and professional journalists, who spend their careers sheltered by the use of the third person (I remember struggling to begin sentences with "I" when I started blogging). But persevere, you will quickly adapt and find it liberating. If you don't, then what you are writing isn't a blog, it's an article.


How often?

How regularly should you blog? The short answer is every day. Readers want to feel the blog is alive, and frequent posts show this. A minimum is twice a week. Any less and you'll need to be a very influential person to get away with it.


One way of getting around having to post frequently yourself is to set up a group blog. But this can be difficult, unless the group shares a clear sense of purpose and similar attitudes. One successful example of this approach is Effect Measure, run by a group of public health professionals.


If the prospect of posting daily seems off-putting, remember that each post does not have to be a thousand words of carefully argued and finely crafted prose. Quite the reverse in fact — think of it as having a conversation with your readers.


Short observations on news events that use your expertise, for example to point out misconceptions, are great. Posts that link to new or interesting information elsewhere on the web are also very valuable.


You are using your special knowledge to filter the vast amount of content on the web for others. By aggregating material, you are editing the web for your readers. And remember, the links don't just need to be to articles. Video, pictures and graphics can be even more interesting. If I was blogging about penguins, I'd definitely be linking to this video. And taking your own photographs or video is even better — they are simple to add to blogs.


Technical aspects

I won't try to give a step-by-step account of how to blog here — there are plenty online. But if you can use a word processor and web browser, you already have 90 per cent of the skills you need. The other ten per cent are very simple, for example using basic HTML, or the buttons in your blog software, to make key phrases bold or to add web links.


There is a wide variety of blog software available, all with guides on how to use them. You can choose what suits your level of technical knowledge. The simplest host the blog for you, with the most popular being Blogger, Wordpress and Typepad.


The downside with these blog sites is that you have less control over the URL. If you want to host your own blog, check out Movable Type, for example.


The Guardian's blogging guru, Kevin Anderson, recommends guides to the pros and cons of different options available on these sites: Problogger, readwriteweb and pcworld.com.


Limited bandwidth and Internet access in some areas of the developing world may limit all forms of blogging.


Jonathan Gosier, a software developer living in Kampala, Uganda, describes blogging from a developing country as "a lesson in patience, endurance and ingenuity". On his blog on Apprifca he recommends ten applications that can ease the challenges of dealing with power cuts, unstable Internet connections and potential data loss.


Getting a readership

Once you have your blog up and running, you'll need to get people coming to visit. This can be hard at the start, but be patient. There are a number of things you can do, and the key is linking.


First, you need to include lots of links in all that you post. This helps with 'search engine optimisation', that is, it helps search engines understand the sorts of site your blog is like, and this means people searching for your topic will be more likely to find your blog.


Even more important is encouraging links from other sites to your blog. You can do this by leaving comments on other sites you like, which include links back to relevant posts on your blog. Note the word relevant — if your links are not relevant, they will annoy people, which is not a way to become popular.


You can also list the other blogs you like — this is called a blogroll. It's worth asking those bloggers if they would like to link to you — they will if they like your blog. Lastly, it's worth sending details of your blog to Technorati, which acts as a search engine specifically for blogs.


If you intend to blog about peer-reviewed research articles, you could register with Research Blogging, a website which highlights the posts of its registered users when they write about new journal papers.


Generating discussion

There's another important difference between blogging and conventional journalism and science communication. Writers of conventional media must not leave questions hanging — their stories need a beginning, middle and end. But blogging, being a conversation, means you can ask questions, as my food writer colleague Jay Rayner did recently on the topic of genetically modified foods.


A truly great science blog, also connected to the Guardian, is Bad Science, written by the medical doctor Ben Goldacre. His conversations with his readers often generate ideas for future posts.


Discussions with your readers is an essential hallmark of a good blog. A blog without discussion is like a radio talk show without callers — a lecture in fact. The simplest way to create a discussion is by asking for one — "what do you think of what I have written?" When someone does comment, make sure you reply to them on the blog. After all, you wouldn't ignore someone who spoke to you in person.


Not all comments will be interesting or constructive, and moderating the comments on your blog is a difficult balance. If you are oversensitive in deleting comments, readers will soon learn that you are not really interested in having a debate. On the other hand, if you let anything go, you will soon find your blog infested with trolls — people who post irrelevant and provocative comments to disrupt discussions — and this could bore or intimidate interesting people, driving them away.


Many trolls will back down if you reply personally to them. Their aggression fades when they realise there is a real person behind the screen. But I don't want to exaggerate this issue — getting any comments at all is harder than dealing with bad ones. And remember, the blog is your space. You are free to eject people you object to, just as in your own home.


To finish, I have just one more question: what do you think I've missed out?


Damian Carrington is the environment web editor at the United Kingdom's Guardian newspaper former editor of NewScientist.com and science reporter at BBC News Online.



arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    chendaneyl 發表在 痞客邦 留言(1) 人氣()